Question 6: If writers of commentaries like Barnes, Clarke, MacKnight, and church Fathers were with us today, would we offer our fellowship to them?

If writers of commentaries like Barnes, Clarke, MacKnight, and church Fathers were with us today, would we offer our fellowship to them? Are we not fellowshipping them when we refer to their writings and quote them as authorities?

It is interesting how over the years we have quoted from and used the works of men like Barnes, Clarke, MacKnight, and church Fathers, but have been so negative toward them because of their denominational affiliation and lack of agreement with us on some doctrinal issues. The same is true relative to the writers of many hymns and songs we sing in our assembling. It has been said that if Alexander Campbell were to assemble with us today we would not consider him in our fellowship. We are quick to discount or disparage their belief, manifestation of the image of Christ, and spirituality because they didn’t/don’t subscribe to our unwritten creed. In the main, most Churches of Christ would not welcome these men into their fellowships today.

With no intent of being condescending or judgmental of my brethren in Christ in the Churches of Christ, I would welcome them and seek to learn from them as well as share some of my thoughts with them on doctrinal issues. Nevertheless, my welcoming them would not be based upon my quoting from and referring to their writings, for the basis of fellowship is not endorsement. The basis of fellowship is a calling of God through the gospel and a response of belief. The basis of fellowship is not our agreement in knowledge of the scriptures. At times through the years I have even quoted an atheist or agnostic as authoritative on something, but that didn’t mean I considered them in or would welcome them into my fellowship. The criterion is what they think of Jesus Christ. Do they confess “that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh?”

Advertisements

3 responses to “Question 6: If writers of commentaries like Barnes, Clarke, MacKnight, and church Fathers were with us today, would we offer our fellowship to them?

  1. Bro. i am amazed that someone thinks so much like me!

  2. If my brethren in the one-cup Church of Christ were consistent they could not extend fellowship to Alexander Campbell and many others of his day. There’s a problem though. They are not consistent.

  3. Jim, the great commentators Barnes, Clarke, MacKnight all understood the proper use of the term”Impute” in Romans 4. If possible it would have been a pleasure to fellowship with such men. I’ve often heard brethren say, Campbell was a fine man but we couldn’t fellowship him. The same people couldn’t stand on a 24ft. ladder and measure up to A. Campbell.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s